NOBODY’S PROTEST MOVIE (GETS MADE, OR SEEN ENOUGH)?

The Learning Tree (1969)

NOBODY’S PROTEST MOVIE (GETS MADE, OR SEEN ENOUGH)?

By Brandon Harris

On the silent-era Topsy and Eva, and Black American Cinema today.

Brandon Harris comes to 7 Ludlow to present Hellboundtrain/The Blood of Jesus, and Topsy and Eva on February 25, as part of his program Strange Fruit.

Chinonye Chukwu
Chinonye Chukwu

Chinonye Chukwu, one of three black women to direct a film that has won Sundance’s US Narrative Grand Jury Prize in the past five years, and one of six black directors to do so since 2009, responded to her second feature Till (2022) receiving zero Oscar nominations last week with an Instagram post whose caption read: “We live in a world and work in industries that are so aggressively committed to upholding whiteness and perpetuating an unabashed misogyny towards Black women.”

I type these words in Park City, Utah, where this year’s Sundance Film Festival includes another bumper crop of black filmmakers and subjects within its US Narrative Competition, working in a variety of distinctive modes, from the rural southern slow cinema of Raven Jackson’s All Dirt Roads Taste of Salt to the urban anomie of A.V. Rockwell’s US Narrative Grand Jury Prize-winner A Thousand and One, about a young mother in a rapidly gentrifying New York. The main controversy the festival sparked this year, concerning the elegantly staged for maximum press exposure walkout of the US Narrative Jury, led by black playwright of the moment Jeremy O. Harris five minutes into Elijah Bynum’s divisive Magazine Dreams (which world premiered without the closed-caption technology that would have enabled fellow juror Marlee Matlin to understand what was being said and heard given the actress is deaf) was essentially a conflict between two black men who had reached the pinnacle of their craft in the eyes of many. Wasn’t Black Panther: Wakanda Forever (2022) insanely profitable? What more could we want?

One black filmmaker I spoke to, a Sundance alumni himself who, like I, was sitting in an oddly empty Eccles Theater during Sundance’s second week—when screenings were normally still quite full in the times before cinema and the world which gave birth to it were so actively dying—bemoaned Chukwu’s choice of words, claiming it gave white executives who still hold most of the power concerning which black careers thrive and which don’t the ammo to use against other black filmmakers and projects.

That what Chukwu said seems uncharitable to some who are sympathetic to her hyperbolic message, given their not dissimilar experience, years after all the hullabaloo about #OscarsSoWhite and the demonstrably successful inclusion efforts within the academy that she indirectly bemoaned on Instagram, is understandable to me. But, quiet as it’s kept, she doesn’t know the half of how right she is; when I was advocating for another Chukwu picture at a studio I once worked at, a movie based on a remarkable black feminist political memoir and set-up with a pair of on-the-come-up black stars, and an excellent script one could easily imagine leading to a bidding war if Jennifer Lawrence or Margot Robbie were attached, a powerful white female movie executive said of the project, “It feels like eating my vegetables,” without a word as to why, just a few months after George Floyd’s body went forcibly cold and earnestly useless black squares started popping up on the social media feeds of corporate movie studios. The movie never got made, and Chukwu moved on to Till, in which Danielle Deadwyler gives one of the performances of the decade. I don’t know a single person who paid to see it other than my mother’s retired roommate, an aging, single gay and black cinephile in the Cincinnati suburbs with little better to do.

what we mean when we say “Black American Cinema” is slippery, hard to pin down, open to interpretation.

Yet, despite the obstacles of ignorant white people in positions of power, and all too slender marketing budgets for movies about people who were called negroes in the era in which the film was set, it’s obvious that the canon of Black American Cinema keeps growing larger. It ain’t the worst of times. Opportunities within the world of cinema—among both the image-conscious corporations that finance it at the studio level, and the non-profits whose artist development and investor cultivation efforts are devoted to the same Diversity, Equity and Inclusion principles one finds in liberal American institutions writ large—have increased rapidly for well connected, code-switch trained black professionals, and the occasional working class interloper, too. This “Black Excellence Industrial Complex,” as some cynical observers have coined the systems at play in the current moment, has yielded enhanced employment opportunities for some talented and some very mediocre executives, artists, and craftspeople, several wonderful motion pictures, and many trifling ones, too. Few if any of these people, save perhaps Alana Mayo at Orion Pictures, the studio that released Till, have greenlight authority though.

What we mean, though, when we say “Black American Cinema” is as slippery, hard to pin down and open to interpretation as ever. Generally, we know it when we see it. No one I have encountered in this all-too-quick life is uncomfortable thinking of, say, Do the Right Thing (1989) or Daughters of the Dust (1991) as representative of the term. Uniquely African American subject matter married to the voice of an African American artist—key boxes checked regardless of where the money came from, what the ethnic make-up of the rest of the crew was, what ethos all these elements were brought together by. It’s when one of those two at the top isn’t checked that the ambiguity begins.

Topsy and Eva (1927), which Metrograph will screen accompanied by a live score as part of a series I have curated of eclectic, unusual, underseen “black” movies titled Strange Fruit, is the most extreme example of this conundrum I have encountered. The movie is a sight gag– and minstrelsy-fueled adaptation of the popular vaudeville show, which itself was a reimagining of Uncle Tom’s Cabin, then and now the most filmed American novel, although no one has dared try since the late 1980s. It focuses on two relatively minor characters in the book, and was helmed by the Canadian Del Lord, best known for directing dozens of Three Stooges shorts—Booby Dupes (1945) is a favorite—in the ’30s and ’40s. The Step Brothers (2008) of its time, the movie is a freewheeling and highly offensive comedy in which a majority of its black characters, including the titular Topsy, are played by white performers in blackface.

However, Noble Johnson—who became the first black contract player in studio history when he signed a deal at Universal at some point between the years 1917 and 1920—co-stars as Uncle Tom, a role which he largely plays straight against Rosetta Duncan, shucking and jiving her way through an interpretation of what it’s like to be an enslaved black child as Topsy. Her real-life sister Vivian plays Eva, the doomed white child in the novel who is saved by and finds fellowship with Tom due to their shared Christian faith.

There are multiple layers of tragedy in embedded in this production, both on-screen and off, which are well worth unpacking. I came across the film, the only existent feature in which Johnson plays an African American character, while researching a television show about Noble Johnson and his brother, George, that the production company I am president of is developing. A successful star and producer of so-called “race movies” under the banner of the Lincoln Motion Picture Company that he started with George in 1916, Noble eventually swore off their avowed mission of making films about black people that eschewed the dominant minstrel stereotypes—Toms, Coons, Mulattoes, Mammies, and Bucks, per the iconic 1973 Donald Bogle book of the same name—in order to be an ethnically ambiguous bit player within the nascent Universal machine, causing him to fall out, at least temporarily, with his brother, who continued producing race movies until 1921.

George insisted they remain self-sufficient and only take black financing for their pictures, such as The Realization of a Negro’s Ambition (1916) or The Trooper of Troop K (1917), both of which were seen widely by black audiences at the time, and are now, along with the rest of the Lincoln catalogue, seemingly lost for good. But Lincoln did take on white financing for its last picture, By Right of Birth (1921), an ambitious production that failed to recoup and ultimately sunk the endeavor. By this time Universal, having taken away the company’s box office draw three years before (as part of his deal with the studio, Johnson’s name and likeness could no longer appear on the promotional material for any of Lincoln movies), knew that black audiences would happily turn out for white studio pictures in which Johnson was featured as something other than black. Johnson’s undeniable popularity within black America ironically hastened the fall of his own fledgling black production company, which his new employers understood to be a threat.

I wonder what George thought of Topsy and Eva. It was made at United Artists—which, unlike Universal, the studio that forced Noble to step down from Lincoln in 1918, was seemingly willing to let him play a negro and put him in the advertising as such; he appears in many lobby cards for the film that exist to this day, opposite the Duncan sisters. United Artists was also the studio co-founded by Noble’s Intolerance (1916) collaborator D.W. Griffith, then on the downside of his infamous career, who filled in for Lord to direct several scenes of Topsy and Eva. In the film, Noble plays a black character for the first time since his exiting Lincoln. That he does so opposite whites in blackface embodying some of the crudest stereotypes about blacks in a narrative that both ridicules and maintains nostalgia for chattel slavery feels like a surreal twist of the knife.

trooperoftroopk

Noble Johnson in The Trooper of Troop K (1917)

Harriet Beecher Stowe’s contemporaneously beloved book—an abolitionist classic whose prestige was well in decline by the time James Baldwin excoriated it in his iconic 1949 essay “Everybody’s Protest Novel”—was at the peak of its popularity when the cinematic reimagining of Catherine Chisholm Cushing’s “comedic” stage adaptation met Lord’s nimble, gag-sniffing sensibility. In his and Cushing’s telling, Eva becomes more or less inseparable from Topsy, whom she convinces her parents to buy and make her constant companion.

The children are delivered, by separate white and black storks, right after the closing credits; a clear day when the white stork delivers Eva, it’s thundering when the black stork arrives near the slave grounds. A heavy set white woman in blackface, hanging laundry in the rain, attempts to shoo the stork away. “On yo’ way, bird! Ain’t yo’ got no respect for us single gals?” she says. By film’s end, praying for God to spare Eva’s life after she has fallen ill, Topsy also tells God what she seemingly won’t ask for but very much wants. “An’ I won’t ask You to make me white as snow—just a light tan will do.” The mechanisms Chukwu spoke of are, like most human follies, older than the cinema, and often it’s the oldest cinema that makes this plain. Topsy and Eva didn’t work as entertainment then—the movie bombed and has rarely, if ever, screened commercially since—and assuredly won’t now, for most audiences. But the cognitive dissonance between the movie’s ostensible takeaway—that the Peculiar Institution is unnecessary and cruel, and needs to be subverted by blacks, and stewarded by less callous whites—and the means with which it relays this to the audience, in a propulsive, hijinks-stuffed narrative, is profoundly weird and probably worth stomaching if the intersection of American history and what we mean when we say “Black American Cinema” matter to you.

My mother and I, watching it over the holidays, accompanied by Carman Moore’s score to Bill Gunn’s Personal Problems (1980), gave ourselves permission to laugh with the movie. We found it far more palatable and subversive than the maudlin if well-meaning Emancipation (2022) or FX’s kinetic if needlessly pulled into the present update of Octavia Butler’s novel Kindred, the latter recently canceled. Both dropped at the end of the year to general indifference from audiences, assuring us that potentially better executed stories about black life pre-1865 will have a harder road to hoe to get financed. Fucking vegetables…

Was Noble Johnson a sellout? What was he thinking? These are questions for another essay (or perhaps several seasons of television) because what most interests me is this—does Johnson’s presence, playing the most iconic African American character of American literature in the 19th century against the tonal grain of a project conceived, written, produced, directed, and financed by whites, make Topsy and Eva an example of Black American Cinema?

After all, is Black American Cinema, in our stridently identitarian times, an auteurist inquiry or a representational one anyway? Surely we think of Carl Franklin’s masterwork Devil in a Blue Dress (1995) as black cinema, but what about his follow-up, One True Thing (1998), for which he directed Meryl Streep to an Oscar nomination as a dying woman in the affluent, lily white New Jersey suburbs? Does Franklin’s black gaze, when observing the lives of whites played by famous rich people, count too?

Released in 1969, the recently deceased Bob Downey Sr.’s Putney Swope, about the takeover of a Madison Avenue ad firm by the titular sole black executive on the board who fully and quickly reverses the racial power dynamic by firing all but one white member of the staff, speaks to Black Nationalist themes with verve and aplomb… but no one ever mistook “A Prince” (Downey Sr.’s self-designated credit) for an American negro and his film. Nor his son, regardless of that time he donned blackface to play Kirk Lazarus in Tropic Thunder (2008). It seems rather obvious, given the dominant cultural winds, that both projects would be pilloried by a large swath of observers were they to initially surface today—perhaps rightfully so, perhaps not.

When I was asked to program this series of films at the Metrograph “to commemorate Black History Month,” I wrestled with this problem and others, that of canons and expectations, of dread and boredom, of what is offensive and what is not, of who has a right to say what has been Black American Cinema and what hasn’t. The program pegged to this essay tries not to survey well-known landmarks—the seminal work of Sidney Poitier or Spike Lee, of Hattie McDaniel and Melvin Van Peebles will always be on the repertory circuit—but instead to unearth films that speak to the remarkable dexterity of contexts that black image-making took place in during the six decades between the beginning of the sound era and the end of the Vietnam War. These works—be it Eloyce and James Gist’s revivalist propaganda movie, among the earliest films directed by an African American woman, Hellbound Train/The Blood of Jesus (1930); or Gordon Parks’s autobiographical debut feature, the first made within Hollywood’s studio system written and directed by an African American, The Learning Tree (1969)—are all the stuff of Black History, even if few have gotten the news yet. Here’s hoping it arrives soon enough.

Brandon Harris is the author of Making Rent in Bed-Stuy, the director of Redlegs (2012), a contributing editor at Filmmaker Magazine, an Amazon Studios refugee, and the President and Co-Founder, with Shaka King, of I’d Watch That.

hellbound train

Hellbound Train (1930)