Modesty and Shame

hainley 1

Barney Simon-Davey, Untitled (Eric Smoking), 2014

Modesty and Shame

By Bruce Hainley

On Hervé Guibert’s first, and last, cinematic self-portrait.

Modesty and Shame screens at 7 Ludlow from September 9 and streams on Metrograph At Home from September 10.

Many might wonder why anyone would want to watch a film about someone who turns a Panasonic video camera on himself when he was so emaciated that one of his lovers referred to him as “Auschwitz Baby” and who died before the result’s first broadcast. Yet with the daily suck of mendacity and ignorance that is life in these barely United States a homemade example of unwavering attention to the actual données of existence, which is exactly what Hervé Guibert provides in Modesty or Shame (1992), his only film, might prove salutary. No pious Oscar-winning perfs by straight actors as in Philadelphia, which debuted a year later, just a fag showing his life as it is, point-blank.

Crucial novelist, tender photographer, photography critic for Le Monde, Guibert won a César for writing the screenplay to the erotic tour de force The Wounded Man (1983) with Patrice Chéreau, its director. No naïf, Guibert, for his impudent stress-test of the genre “home movie,” shoots himself talking on the phone, getting a massage, having the runs, almost breaking down. He rides a stationary bike. He consults with nurses. He dances and shadowboxes. He tosses and turns. He has an operation, films the procedure, and then watches the playback. He flies to Italy. He suns and swims. He’s carried on his lover’s back, too unstable to make it over the craggy shore back home. He plays a version of Russian roulette with two glasses of water, one dosed with poison. He eats stone fruit on a patio and reads Walter de la Mare’s Memoirs of a Midget. He films a little lizard leading its lizardy life. Modesty or Shame is a makeshift cinematic sequence of still lives of the second horrible wave of the AIDS epidemic that is still life, still living, not nature morte.

Guibert’s third book, 1980’s Suzanne et Louise, was a photonovel that juxtaposed forty-some of his photographic portraits of his two great aunts—their poise and twinkle, the unwound tresses of their hair—and his exacting prose printed in facsimile of his handwriting. Steadfast inspirations, the aunties shine in Modesty or Shame, not only tutelary spirits in perseverance and humor but also examples of what he will never (get to) be: old. 

hainley 2

Hervé Guibert, Chambre de Mathieu, c. 1989; © Christine Guibert/Courtesy Les Douches la Galerie, Paris.

As much as Guibert’s film remains a document of quotidian events, excruciating or strangely joyful, it tests what can be shown of the aspects of a writer’s life that are writing—even when the writer takes up a camera and points it at himself. Living isn’t quite writing no matter how much is being written on/with his body. Fassbinder admired Douglas Sirk’s repeated scenes of women thinking. “I haven’t noticed that with any other director,” RWF observed. “Usually the women just react, do the things women do, and here they actually think. That’s something you’ve got to see. It’s wonderful to see a woman thinking. That gives you hope.” (It will have to remain until another time to consider exactly about what they are thinking and what thinking is while acting.) But can a camera document anyone actually writing?

Here the writer’s desk, his bookshelves, his insomniac perturbations, all have their scenes, as does hope. But at the end of the film, although the camera shows Guibert typing and the word processor’s delayed strike into action, only in voiceover, Guibert having left the room, does the writer relay the fundamentals he might have been composing—thinking that eludes so many who try to video life now, habits of autosurveillance to which this work is both proleptic counterfactual and paradoxical testament: 

You have to have experienced things a first time before being able to film them on video. If not, you don’t understand them, you don’t live them, the video immediately and stupidly absorbs that unlived life. But it can also form a link between photography, writing, and cinema. With video, you approach a different moment, a new moment, with a kind of superimposition in a purely mental fade-out on the memory of the first moment. And so, the present moment also holds the richness of the past.

Troubling double document.

Bruce Hainley edited Gary Indiana’s Vile Days: The Village Voice Art Columns, 1985–1988 and is the author of, mostly recently, Really, No Biggie.

bruce h 3

Hervé Guibert, Chambre de Mathieu, c. 1989; © Christine Guibert/Courtesy Les Douches la Galerie, Paris.